Female genital mutilation/cutting,timing of deinfibulation,and risk of cesarean section (2021)

This study is a Descriptive research regarding I,II,III FGM/C with the following characteristics:

Author(s): Taraldsen S,Vangen S,Øian P,Sørbye IK
FGM/C Type(s): I,II,III
Health area of focus: Gynaecological,risk of cesarean section.

Objective: The aims of this study were,first,to examine the association between female genital mutilation/cutting and the risk of cesarean section in Norway,and,second,whether the timing of deinfibulation affected the cesarean section risk.
Study Population: nulliparous Somali-born women who gave birth in Norway between 1990 and 2014
Findings: Women with female genital mutilation/cutting type 3 had lower risk of cesarean section compared with women with no female genital mutilation/cutting (OR 0.54,95% CI 0.33-0.89 P = .02). Among the 1504 included women,the cesarean section rate was 28.0% and the proportion of emergency operations was 92.9%. Fetal distress was the primary indication in approximately 50% of cases,across the groups with different female genital mutilation/cutting status. Women who had no deinfibulation before labor onset had lower risk of cesarean section compared with those who underwent deinfibulation before or during pregnancy (OR 0.64,95% CI 0.46-0.88 P = .01).Conclusions
High risk of cesarean section in Somali nulliparous women was not related to the type of female genital mutilation/cutting in the present study. Deinfibulation before labor did not protect against cesarean section. Our findings indicate that nulliparous Somali women are at high risk of intrapartum complications. Future research should focus on measures to reduce maternal morbidity and on how timing of deinfibulation affects the outcomes of vaginal births.

Geographical coverage
Region(s):Northern Europe
Country(ies):Norway

Source

Leave a Reply